Thursday, February 26, 2009

Depends On Your Definition of 'Free'

This is why we liberals are always so confused when the Repubs talked about being the party of freedom.

Daniel Klein offers up a study that proves the obvious:

Conservatives say they are for small government and individual liberty, but a content analysis of leading conservative magazines shows that most have preponderantly failed to take pro-liberty positions on sex, gambling, and drugs.

Besides many anti-liberty commissions, the magazines may be criticized for anti-liberty omission—that is, failing to oppose anti-liberty policies.

Magazines investigated include National Review, The Weekly Standard, The American Enterprise, and The American Spectator.

We find that National Review has had the strongest record on liberty on the issues treated, while the others have preponderantly failed to be pro-liberty or have even been anti-liberty.

No comments: