The rap on Barack Obama, at least in the realm of foreign policy, has been that he is a softheaded idealist ... liberal dreamer who wishes away the world's dangers ... [whose] willingness to meet with tyrants [is] naive ... [and] is in for a rude awakening
These critiques, however, are off the mark. Over the course of the campaign against Hillary Clinton and now McCain, Obama has elaborated more and more the ideas that would undergird his foreign policy as president. What emerges is a world view that is far from that of a typical liberal, much closer to that of a traditional realist. It is interesting to note that, at least in terms of the historical schools of foreign policy, Obama seems to be the cool conservative and McCain the exuberant idealist.
Obama rarely speaks in the moralistic tones of the current Bush administration. He doesn't divide the world into good and evil even when speaking about terrorism. He sees countries and even extremist groups as complex, motivated by power, greed and fear as much as by pure ideology. His interest in diplomacy seems motivated by the sense that one can probe, learn and possibly divide and influence countries and movements precisely because they are not monoliths. When speaking to me about Islamic extremism, for example, he repeatedly emphasized the diversity within the Islamic world, speaking of Arabs, Persians, Africans, Southeast Asians, Shiites and Sunnis, all of whom have their own interests and agendas.
Monday, July 21, 2008
Time Horizon For Sanity
Fareed Zakaria looks at the Obama foreign Policy Vision:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment